
- Amendments to Section 2(61) & Section 20 of CGST.
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
|
Why is This Change Needed? |
Ensures that Input Service Distributors (ISD) can now legally distribute ITC on inter-state supplies where reverse charge mechanism (RCM) is applicable. |
Effective Date |
This amendment will come into effect from 1st April 2025. |
Impact on ISD |
ISD will now be able to distribute GST for inter-state supply of common input services under reverse charge, enhancing the flexibility and clarity in tax distribution. |
Objective |
To align the provisions of the CGST Act with the IGST Act, ensuring smoother distribution of ITC by ISDs on reverse charge transactions for inter-state supplies |
๐ Key Takeaway: The amendments will allow ISDs to distribute ITC for reverse charge on inter-state supplies from 1st April 2025, providing more clarity and expanding the scope of ITC distribution. |
ย 2. Amendment to Section 2(69)(c) of the CGST Act.
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
|
Why is This Change Needed? |
The amendment clarifies the scope of “Local Fund” and “Municipal Fund”, ensuring clearer understanding of these terms as part of the definition of local authority under GST law. |
Impact on Businesses |
Provides clarity on the usage of Local Fund and Municipal Fund in local authority definitions, helping businesses better understand their GST obligations related to local authorities. |
Objective |
To clarify and standardize the definitions, ensuring there is no ambiguity when interpreting these terms in the GST context. |
๐ Key Takeaway: The amendment clarifies the terms “Local Fund” and “Municipal Fund” and ensures better understanding of their role in the definition of local authority for GST purposes. |
3. Amendment to Section 2(116A) & Section 148A of the CGST Act.
Provision |
Details |
New Clause: Section 2(116A) |
Introduces the definition of Unique Identification Marking (UIM) for implementing the Track and Trace Mechanism. |
New Section: 148A |
Provides an enabling mechanism for Track and Trace for specified commodities, as per the 55th GST Council recommendation. |
Objective |
To track evasion-prone commodities and enhance supply chain transparency. |
Key Feature |
Unique Identification Marking (UIM) to be affixed on goods or their packages for tracking purposes. |
55th GST Council Recommendation |
|
๐ Key Takeaway: This amendment strengthens GST compliance by ensuring traceability of high-risk commodities and preventing tax evasion.ย |
4. New Section 122B โ Penalty for Failure to Comply with Track and Trace Mechanism.
Provision |
Details |
New Section: 122B |
Introduces penalties for non-compliance with the Track and Trace Mechanism under Section 148A. |
Penalty Amount |
Whichever is higher of the following: a)ย ย โน1,00,000, or b)ย 10% of the tax payable on such goods. |
Applicability |
Applies to businesses dealing with evasion- prone commodities that fail to comply with the Track and Trace system. |
Additional Penalty |
This penalty is over and above any other penalties under Chapter XV or other provisions of the CGST Act. |
Objective |
Ensures strict enforcement of Track and Trace regulations to curb tax evasion and improve compliance. |
๐ Key Takeaway: Businesses must strictly adhere to the Track and Trace Mechanism, as failure to comply will result in substantial financial penalties. |
5. Amendment: Deletion of Section 12(4) & Section 13(4) โ Time of Supply for Vouchers.
Provision |
Details |
What is changing? |
Sections 12(4) & 13(4) (related to Time of Supply for Vouch |
Reason for Deletion? |
To remove ambiguity in the treatment of vouchers under GST. |
Effect of This Change? |
Vouchers are neither goods nor services, and no GST applies to voucher transactions. |
55th GST Council Recommendations |
|
๐ Key Takeaway: This amendment ensures that voucher transactions are not taxed, except where there are related services or agent commissions. |
6. Amendment to Section 17(5)(d) โ ITC on “Plant and Machinery”.
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
The phrase “plant or machinery” in Section 17(5)(d) is replaced with “plant and machinery”. |
Reason for Change? |
To align the wording with the intent of the section and remove ambiguity after the Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. case. |
Effective Date |
Retrospective from 1st July 2017, overriding any court judgments or orders. |
Supreme Courtโs Ruling (Safari Retreats Case) |
SC ruled that ITC cannot be denied on “plant” due to the wording of “plant or machinery”, interpreting it as an intentional legislative choice rather than a drafting error. |
55th GST Council Recommendation |
|
๐ Key Takeaway: This amendment removes ambiguity in ITC disallowance on immovable properties, ensuring consistent interpretation as per the Explanation in Section 17 of the CGST Act. |
ย 7. Amendment to Proviso of Section 34(2) โ ITC Reversal for Credit Notes.
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
The Proviso to Section 34(2) is amended to explicitly require ITC reversal by the recipient for a supplier to claim a tax reduction via a credit note. |
Why is This Change Needed? |
Ensures that when a supplier reduces their output tax liability via a credit note, the corresponding ITC is reversed by the recipient to prevent revenue loss for the government. |
Impact on Compliance |
GSTR-3B and IMS are being modified to ensure proper tracking of credit notes and ITC reversals. |
Effect on Businesses |
|
Objective |
|
๐ Key Takeaway: This amendment tightens compliance by ensuring that suppliers can only claim a tax reduction on a credit note if the recipient reverses the ITC accordingly.ย |
ย 8. Amendment to Section 38 โ Communication of Inward Supplies & ITC.
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
|
Reason for Change? |
Aligns ITC statement generation with taxpayer actions on the Invoice Management System (IMS) instead of relying on an auto-generated system. |
Impact on Businesses |
FORM GSTR-2B will now be generated based on taxpayer actions in IMS, ensuring greater accuracy and control. |
55th GST Council Recommendation |
|
Objective |
|
๐ Key Takeaway: The amendment eliminates auto-generated ITC statements and ensures ITC is determined based on taxpayer actions in IMS, leading to better control and compliance.ย |
ย 9. Amendment to Section 39 โ Filing of Returns (GSTR- 3B Conditions & Restrictions).
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
Section 39(1) amended to introduceย conditions & restrictions for filing returns. |
Why is This Change Needed? |
Ensures FORM GSTR-3B for a tax period can be filed only after FORM GSTR-2B is available on the portal. |
55th GST Council Recommendation |
|
Impact on Businesses |
|
Objective |
|
๐ Key Takeaway: |
ย 10. Amendment to Section 107 โ Appeals to Appellate Authority (Pre-deposit for Penalty).ย
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
|
Why is This Change Needed? |
The amendment aims to reduce the burden on taxpayers appealing penalties without tax demand, making the appeal process more accessible. |
55th GST Council Recommendation |
Reduce the pre-deposit requirement to 10% for appeals concerning penalty only (no tax). |
Impact on Businesses |
Pre-deposit for penalty-only cases will now be lower (10%), easing the financial burden on businesses appealing penalties. |
Objective |
Facilitates easier appeals by reducing the upfront cost for businesses facing penalty- only demands |
๐ Key Takeaway: |
11. Amendment to Section 112 โ Appeals to Appellate Tribunal (Pre-deposit for Penalty).
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
New proviso inserted in Section 112(8) to require a 10% pre-deposit for filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal in cases involving only penalty (no tax demand) |
Why is This Change Needed? |
The amendment introduces a pre-deposit requirement that did not exist previously, ensuring consistency with similar provisions in the appeal process for penalty cases. |
55th GST Council Recommendation |
Introduce a 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only cases in appeals to the Appellate Tribunal. |
Impact on Businesses |
Pre-deposit of 10% is now mandatory for appealing penalties (without tax demand) before the Appellate Tribunal, reducing the financial burden on businesses. |
Objective |
Ensure uniformity in the appeal process by introducing pre-deposit requirements for penalty-only appeals, aligning with changes in the Appellate Authority appeals process. |
๐ Key Takeaway: A 10% pre-deposit is now required for penalty-only appeals before the Appellate Tribunal, which was previously not mandated.ย |
12. Amendment to Schedule III โ CGST Act (SEZ/FTWZ Warehoused Goods.
Provision |
Details |
What is Changing? |
|
Why is This Change Needed? |
Aligns the treatment of goods warehoused in Special Economic Zones (SEZ) and Free Trade Warehousing Zones (FTWZ) with the existing provisions for customs bondedย warehouses under GST. |
Impact on Businesses |
Transactions involving the supply of goods in SEZ/FTWZ will now be excluded from GST, similar to transactions in customs bonded warehouses, until goods are clearedย for export or moved to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). |
Refund Impact |
No refund will be provided for any tax collected on these transactions before the amendment. |
Objective |
Harmonize the GST treatment of goods in SEZ and FTWZ with customs procedures, ensuring clarity and fairness inย transactions. |
๐ Key Takeaway: The amendment exempts supply transactions of goods warehoused in SEZ/FTWZ from being treated as a supply of goods or services until cleared for export or DTA, aligning with customs-bonded warehouse provisions.ย |
ย